Hawaii Under the Gun?

Yes. Alaska too, I believe.

Stand by for high winds and heavy seas. I certainly hope this does not go catastrophic, but I earnestly hope and desire that this country and her allies can de-fang the rogue state of North Korea. I care less about regime change than I do about removing a significant threat to stability and peace.

Good things we have some adults in charge.

Über vmijpp

VMIJPP hails from the star city of the south, Roanoke, Virginia. A 1989 graduate of the Virginia Military Institute, he is a retired artillery officer in the United States Marine Corps, with time in both the active and reserve sides. He served in Iraq in 2004, and in Afghanistan in 2009-2010. He joined the magnificent OPFOR.com as a guest blogger from the now defunct but never uninteresting Rule 308, where he denounced gun control and other aspects of tyranny, and proclaimed the greatness of the United States. When the sun set on OPFOR.com, he migrated here with Keydet1976 and the others.
Dieser Beitrag wurde unter Defending the Homeland, Diplomacy, Korea veröffentlicht. Setze ein Lesezeichen auf den Permalink.

3 Antworten zu Hawaii Under the Gun?

  1. DaveO schreibt:

    It isn’t a rogue state insomuch as it is an insane leader who’s tortured and/or executed even his closest allies just to ensure the most fanatical loyalty.

    But, the Russians! And, Ann Coulter in Berkley!!

    Fortunately the US of A is protected from the most dangerous COA: shooting nukes straight up into the Mesosphere and detonating them over CONUS. EMP. No hardened or improved or even repaired „shovel-ready“ infrastructure. Herds of millenials with no wifi and no cash. Anarchists forced to work at McDonald’s instead of binging on Mom’s Netflix and medicinal weed supply. The horror! The horror.

    Gefällt mir

  2. burkemblog schreibt:

    I’ve been thinking about this lately–the Trump wish to get China to „help“ us with North Korea. What Xi is playing us, making us take our eye off the ball in the South China Sea, where they really want to extend Chinese control? What if the price for „helping“ us with North Korea is backing off our strategic commitment to freedom of navigation in the southern waters around the Philippines and SE Asia? I am less worried about North Korean nukes aimed at the US or Japan than I am about the Chinese. The North Koreans know we can take them out and destroy their country (at tremendous cost to the Korean peninsula), so I honestly think this is all saber- (or missile-) rattling on both sides. I am worried, however, that the Chinese will play the current administration like a fiddle. It may well be the case that dropping out of TPP was the first major blunder of 2017.

    Gefällt 1 Person

    • DaveO schreibt:

      Entirely possible. Xi needs control of the South China Sea to keep the Colonels of the PLA under control while China continues its transition to a neo-Han Empire.

      Gefällt mir

Kommentar verfassen

Trage deine Daten unten ein oder klicke ein Icon um dich einzuloggen:

WordPress.com-Logo

Du kommentierst mit Deinem WordPress.com-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Google+ Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Google+-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Twitter-Bild

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Twitter-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Facebook-Foto

Du kommentierst mit Deinem Facebook-Konto. Abmelden /  Ändern )

Verbinde mit %s